Figure 1: The Yale Database.
The experiments were performed using the ``leave-one-out'' strategy:
To classify an image of person, that image is removed from the training
set of M-1 images and the dimensionality reduction matrix is computed.
All the M images in the training set are projected to a reduced space using
the computed matrix and recognition is performed using a nearest neighbor
classification. The number of eigenvectors (or principal components)
are empirically
determined to achieve lowest error rate by each method. Table 1 shows
the experimental results. Empirical results show that Kernel PCA method
with a cubic polynomial kernel achieve the lowest error rate. Furthermore,
the results show that Kernel PCA methods are insensitive to the degree
of
polynomial kernels.
Table 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The AT&T (formerly Olivetti) database contains 400 images of 40
subjects that include variation in facial expression and pose. Each face
image is downsampled to 23 x 28 to reduce the computational complexity.
Figure 2 shows images of two subjects. In contrast to the Yale database,
the images include the facial
contours and certain pose variations. However, the lighting conditions
remain the same.
Figure 2. The AT&T Face Database

We use the same strategy with the experiments using the Yale data set.
Table 2 summarizes the empirical results. Consistent with the experiments
on Yale atabase, Kernel PCA methods achieve lower error rates than
the Eigenface approach on the AT\&T dataset.
Table 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future research will focus on analyzing face recognition methods using
other kernel methods in high dimensional space. We plan to investigate
and compare the performance of face recognition methods using Kernel
Fisher Linear Discriminant, Independent Component Analysis
and Kernel PCA.